EVISA Print | Glossary on | Contact EVISA | Sitemap | Home   
 Advanced search
The establishment of EVISA is funded by the EU through the Fifth Framework Programme (G7RT- CT- 2002- 05112).


Supporters of EVISA includes:

Speciation and Toxicity

(16.03.2008)


As an example, the element arsenic is often taken as a synonym for poison, while the arsenic compounds present in fish and other seafood are actually as harmless as table salt:

CHEMICAL SPECIESLD50 (mg/kg)
Arsenite (As(III))    
14
Arsenate (As(V))
20
Arsine (AsH3)3
Monomethylarsonic Acid (MMA)700 - 1800
Dimethylarsinic Acid (DMA)
700 - 2600
Arsenocholine
> 10000
Arsenobetaine> 10000

LD50 rat: concentration leading to the death of 50 % of a rat population

Since the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of a chemical substance depend primarily on its molecular structure and not on one of its elemental constituents, so does its toxicity.

As an example let us discuss the toxicity of organotin compounds:

As has been shown by Luedke et al., 1991, the toxicity of di- and tri-organotin compounds (chlorides) depends on the target organism and is a function of the molecular volume of the compound (and not of the inclusion of a  "toxic element"  tin in the compound !).

The toxicity of often called “toxic trace elements” depends on their speciation and concentration not only in a quantitative way but also in a qualitative way.

Some examples:

  • Cr(III) is considered to be essential while Cr(VI) is cancerogen
  • Inorganic As(III) compounds are cancerogen while Arsenobetaine is essential non-toxic
  • Inorganic tin compounds are discussed as being essential for plants and some animals but tributyltin (TBT) is an endocrine discuptor

The chemical species of a metal can effect its toxicity by influencing its

  • absorption (or the physical availability for exposure - if the metal is tightly bound to in-absorbable material, it cannot be readily taken up, e.g. into the blood stream of the organism)
  • distribution (the internal transport inside the organism to the tissue on which it has toxic effects - for example the crossing of the intestinal membrane or the blood-brain barrier)
  • biotransformation (its accumulation, bio-modification, detoxification in – and excretion from – the tissues)
It is therefore essential that toxicological studies should always consider the species present rather than the elemental constituent in order to create meaningful data. With respect to risk assessment and legislation it becomes more and more clear that failure to consider properly chemical speciation of elements other than carbon can lead to poor use of our resources. Laws and regulations based on simple elemental analysis may wrongly condemn environmental media or products as toxic and prevent the use of important resources.

When evaluationg the toxicity of a target compound (species), the possibility of species conversion during the test period must be considered. Such conversion might be produced by reactions of the target compound with components of the studied system (e.g. cell culture media) such as redox reactions, hydrolysis, adduct formation or complexation, leading to declining concentrations of the target compound and appearance of new species. For such reasons, toxicity test should be accompanied by analytical testing verifying that the species present is the target compound and the concentration level being present during the exposure time is the target exposure level. If that is not the case, time weighted exposure levels can be used instead of concentration levels.


Related Resources

The Metal Speciation Toxicokinetics Database
EVISA Link Database: Toxicity of Elemental Species


 Further Reading

H.E. Allen, R.H. Hall, T.D. Brisbin, Metal speciation. Effect on aquatic toxicity,  Environ. Sci. Technol.,  14/4 (1980) 441-443. DOI: 10.1021/es60164a002

M.L. Freedman, P.M. Cunningham, J.E. Schindler, M.J. Zimmerman, Effect of lead speciation on toxicity, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 25/1 (1980) 389-393. DOI: 10.1007/BF01985543

G.M.P. Morrison, G.E. Batley, T.M. Florence, Metal speciation and toxicity, Chem. Br., 25 (1989) 91-96. 

T. Wolf, R. Kasemann, H. Ottenwälder, Molecular interaction of different chromium species with nucleotides and nucleic acids, Carcinogenesis, 10/4 (1989) 655-659. doi: 10.1093/carcin/10.4.655 

 K.A. Biedermann, J.R. Landolph, Role of valency state and solubility of chromium compounds on induction of cytotoxicity, mutagenesis, and anchorage independence in diploid human fibroplasts, Cancer Res., 50/24 (1990) 7835-7842.

 E. Luedke, E. Lucero, G. Eng, Molecular volume as a predictor of organotin biotoxicity, Main Group Metal Chemistry, 14 (1991) 59

T. Kaise, S. Fukui, The chemical form and acute toxicity of arsenic compounds in marine organisms, Appl. Organomet. Chem., 6/2 (1992) 155-160. doi: 10.1002/aoc.590060208

 S.B. Jonnalagadda, P.V. Rao, Toxicity, bioavailability and metal speciation, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C, 106/3 (1993) 585-595. doi: 10.1016/0742-8413(93)90215-7

Guy Berthon, Chemical speciation studies in relation to aluminium metabolism and toxicity, Coord. Chem. Rev., 149 (1996) 241-280. doi: 10.1016/S0010-8545(96)90030-2

D.M. Templeton, Trace element speciation in toxicology and clinical sciences, Analusis, 26/6 (1998) M68-M71. doi: 10.1051/analusis:1998151

 S.D. Kim, H. Ma, H.E. Allen, D.K. Cha, Influence of dissolved organic matter on the toxicity of copper to Ceriodaphnia dubia: effect of complexation kinetics, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 18 (1999) 2433-2437. DOI: 10.1897/1551-5028(1999)018<2433:IODOMO>2.3.CO;2

Evert Nieboer, Glenn G. Fletcher, Yngvar Thomassen, Relevance of reactivity determinants to exposure assessment and biological monitoring of the elements, J. Environ. Monit., 1 (1999) 1–14. DOI: 10.1039/a808849g

S.H. Reaney, C.L. Kwik-Uribe, D.R. Smith, Manganese oxidation state and its implications for toxicity, Chem. Res. Toxicol., 15 (2002) 1119–1126. DOI: 10.1021/tx025525e

D. Bagchi, S.J. Stohs, B.W. Downs, M. Bagchi, H.G. Preuss, Cytotoxicity and oxidative mechanisms of different forms of chromium, Toxicol., 180/1 (2003) 5-22. doi: 10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00378-4

L. Normandin, L. Ann Beaupre, F. Salehi, A. St -Pierre, G. Kennedy, D. Mergler, R.F.  Butterworth, S. Philippe, J. Zayed, Manganese distribution in the brain and neurobehavioral changes following inhalation exposure of rats to three chemical forms of manganese, Neurotoxicology, 25 (2004) 433– 441. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2003.10.001

 J.H. Duffus, Chemical speciation terminology: chromium chemistry and cancer, Mineral. Mag. (London), 69/5 (2005) 557-562. doi: 10.1180/0026461056950270

 K.F. Akter, G. Owens, D.E. Davey, R. Naidu, Arsenic speciation and toxicity in biological systems, Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 184 (2005) 97-149. doi: 10.1007/0-387-27565-7_3

 P. Apostoli, R. Cornelis, J. Duffus, P. Hoet, D. Lison, D. Templeton, Elemental Speciation in Human Health Risk Assessment, WHO, Environmental Health Criteria #234 (2006)

 Richard J. Reeder, Martin A. A. Schoonen, Antonio Lanzirotti, Metal Speciation and Its Role in Bioaccessibility and Bioavailability, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 64/1 (2006)  59-113. DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2006.64.3

B. Michalke, S. Halbach, V. Nischwitz, Metal speciation related to neurotoxicity in humans, J. Environ. Monit., 11 (2009) 939-954. doi: 10.1039/b817817h

Y. Ogra, Toxicometallomics for Research on the Toxicology of Exotic Metalloids Based on Speciation Studies, Anal. Sci., 25/10 (2009) 1189-1195. doi: 10.2116/analsci.25.1189

 L. Lévesque, C.A. Mizzen, D.R. McLachlan, P.E. Fraser, Ligand specific effects on aluminum incorporation and toxicity in neurons and astrocytes, Brain Res., 877 (2009) 191-202. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02637-8

T.L. Pan, P.W. Wang, S.A. Al-Suiwayeh, C.C. Chen, J.Y. Fang, Skin toxicology of lead species evaluated by their permeability and proteomic profiles: A comparison of organic and inorganic lead, Toxixol. Lett., 197/1 (2010) 19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.04.019

D.A.L. Vignati, J. Dominik, M.L. Beye, M. Pettine, B.J.D. Ferrari, Chromium(VI) is more toxic than chromium(III) to freshwater algae: A paradigm to revise ?, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 73/5 (2010) 743-749. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.01.011

N. Strigul, A. Koutsospyros, C. Christodoulatos, Tungsten speciation and toxicity: Acute toxicity of mono- and poly-tungstate to fish, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 73/2 (2010) 164-171. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.08.016

G. Papathanasiou, K.N. White, R. Walton, S. Boult, Toxicity of aluminium in natural waters controlled by typew rather than quantity of natural organic matter, Sci. Total. Environ., 409/24 (2011) 5277-5283. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.08.064

Malgorzata Korbas, Tracy C. MacDonald, Ingrid J. Pickering, Graham N. George, Patrick H. Krone, Chemical Form Matters: Differential Accumulation of Mercury Following Inorganic and Organic Mercury Exposures in Zebrafish Larvae, ACS Chem. Biol., 7/2 (2012) 411–420.
DOI: 10.1021/cb200287c


Related EVISA News (newest first)

August 2, 2010: Gut bacteria transform inorganic arsenate leading to more toxic arsenic species
June 12, 2010: Chromium(VI) much more toxic than chromium(III): At least for freshwater algae a paradigm to revise?
May 17, 2010: Uptake of arsenic through human skin depends strongly on its speciation
EVISA News, January 14, 2010: Form of Mercury in Older Dental Fillings Unlikely to be Toxic
November 12, 2008: Mechanism of immuno toxicity of dibutyltin clarified
November 20, 2006: Metal species and Alzheimer disease


last time modified: Septgember 13, 2013




Comments
Organic Arsenic is quite toxic
I think it is important to note that while the lethal dose for 50% of the population is higher with inorganic arsenic, organic arsenic is indicated now as being more biologically active and likely responsible for bladder, lung, kidney, and skin cancer. At levels in drinking water these become more of a concern than the acute cellular or organism level toxicity seen with Asi.
2011--0-5-  Alex the chemist






Imprint     Disclaimer

© 2003 - 2010 by European Virtual Institute for Speciation Analysis ( EVISA )