Researchers from Italy propose to use frontal chromatography for fast separation of inorganic arsenic species. The principle advantage of the technique is the simple instrumental setup providing high sample throughput.
Since the total concentration of trace elements does not provide good enough information about the mobility, transport, fate and impact of the elements in environmental and biological systems, speciation analysis has become increasingly important. Unfortunately, most element selective detection techniques are not species selective and therefore require to be combined with a separation technique.
The hyphenated technique is not only more complex and costly, but also provides only a reduced sample throughput, making speciation analysis costly. While ICP-MS can do multielement determinations at a sampling rate of 60 samples per hour and higher, the coupled technique HPLC-ICP-MS requires several minutes for the species determination of a single element. For this reason, the optimization of the separation method with respect to analysis time is a prerequisite to enhance the acceptance of speciation analysis in the routine environment.The new study:
For cases in which the species of interest are extremely different in some characteristics such as ionic/neutral, cationic/anionic, organic/inorganic the required separation power is limited. In such cases of "binary" speciation also non-chromatographic separation methods have been used (see the Brief Summary).
In case that a chromatographic column is used for such separation task, a very short column with a very low number of theoretical plates is potentially suitable. Moreover, if the back pressure caused by the short column is sufficiently low, its feeding may be simply carried out with a peristaltic pump. Methods using such low pressure have been reported in the literature and columns for it have been provided commercially.
Now a team of Italian researchers is going one step further in simplifying the separation technique by proposing to use frontal chromatography that is avoiding the use of an injection valve.
Figure: Principal instrumental setup for frontal chromatography coupled to ICP-MS
In frontal chromatography, or frontal development, the sample is also used for elution. Thus, the sample feed is continuously applied to the column and the sample components will displace each other in order of decreasing affinity for the chromatographic medium (this is called sample self-displacement). The least retained solute will be obtained in a pure form (i.e. depleted of the more strongly retained components) until the other solutes break through. Eventually the column will be saturated with the strongest retained component and the effluent will have the same composition as the feed. Thus, even the strongest retained component may be obtained after washing the column and a desorption step.
The researchers tried two different setups using two peristaltic pumps. In the optimized setup, the first pump is used to load the sample onto the column, while the second pump is used to add nitric acid to the eluent and to split the eluent towards the mixing point.
This very simple configuration enabled an efficient separation of the fronts of the two species, showing up in two distinct sigmoidal curves. The first sigmoidal curve is related to As(III), which is not retained by the strong anionic exchange resin, whereas the second curve is due to the presence of As(V) which interacts with the stationary phase. The analysis time to record the two signals was optimized to about 160 s.
For signal evaluation the researchers used the slopes of the frontal curves over the inflection points by evaluating two non-overlapping zones of the chromatogram around 25 and 100 s. Moderately accurate quantification of the two species were obtained by using 9 single species standard solutions for the calibration. The mean relative absolute errors in prediction were 3.5% for As(III) and 6.6% for As(V). Unfortunately, approx. 3-times higher errors are observed, when low levels of one species have to be detected in presence of high concentrations of the other species.
The advantages of the approach are:
- simple instrumental setup
- peristaltic instead of high-pressure pump
- no in jection valve
- very short column
- high sample throughput
The disadvantages are:
- PLS multivariate regression used for calibration is not part of the instrument software
- analysis is limited to simple binary speciation tasks
- since no eluent is used to wash the column sample carryover has to be investigated
- high sample volume consumption
- high amount of matrix loaded onto column
- moderate precision and accuracy
Therefore this approach for determining the two inorganic arsenic
species in less than 2 minutes can be an option, if fast analysis with
moderate precision is fit for purpose and sufficient sample amount is available.
The original publication:
Davide Spanu, Damiano Monticelli, Laura Rampazzi, Carlo Dossi, and Sandro Recchia, Introducing Frontal Chromatography-ICP-MS as a fast method for speciation analysis: the case of inorganic As
, Anal. Chem., 91/21 (2019) 13810-13817. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b03279
C. Derrick Quarles, Jr, Patrick Sullivan, M. Paul Field, Scott Smith, Daniel R. Wiederin, Use of an inline dilution method to eliminate species interconversion for LC-ICP-MS based applications: focus on arsenic in urine
, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2018, 33, 745–751. DOI: 10.1039/c8ja00038g
Tomohiro Narukawa, Koichi Chiba, Savarin Sinaviwat, Jörg Feldmann, A rapid monitoring method for inorganic arsenic in rice flour using reversed phase-high performance liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
, J. Chromatogr. A, 1479 (2017) 129-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.12.001
Jackson, Fast Ion Chromatography-ICP-QQQ for Arsenic Speciation
. J. Anal. At.
Spectrom. 2015, 30 (V), 1405–1407. DOI: 10.1039/c5ja00049a
J. Morton, E. Leese, Arsenic speciation in clinical samples: Urine analysis using fast micro-liquid chromatography ICP-MS
, Anal. Bioanal. Chem, 399 (2011) 1781-1788. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-010-4180-z
Related EVISA Resources
last time modified: November 20, 2019