EVISA Print | Glossary on | Contact EVISA | Sitemap | Home   
 Advanced search
The establishment of EVISA is funded by the EU through the Fifth Framework Programme (G7RT- CT- 2002- 05112).


Supporters of EVISA includes:

Arsenic concentration in groundwater may be affected by bacteria

(14.06.2005)


Arsenic contamination of drinking water is also of concern in the US and other industrial nations. For example, in Maine (USA), approximately 70% percent of state residents rely on groundwater sources for their drinking water, with about 56% using private wells. Unfortunately many of these wells contain arsenic concentrations in excess of the USEPA drinking water limit of 10 ppb, and since there is no requirement to test private wells, many people may unknowingly be exposed to high arsenic concentrations.
 
The concentration of arsenic in groundwater can be affected by the activity of certain bacteria according to the results of a project that was completed at the University of Maine by Ph.D. candidate Jennifer Weldon under the supervision of Dr. Jean MacRae.  The project, funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Career program (Bioengineering and Environmental Systems), has been presented at the General Meeting of the American Society of Microbiology (ASM), June 8th 2005 in Atlanta, GA.
 
Microorganisms can affect arsenic mobility either directly or indirectly. By acting directly on arsenate, they may produce arsenite, which is more toxic and more mobile in groundwater.  Indirect means of altering arsenic mobility include the reduction of solid phase bedrock materials or coatings such as iron hydroxides that normally bind arsenic.
 
To see how bacteria affect arsenic concentration, groundwater samples were taken from two high-arsenic areas in Maine, and water chemistry and two bacterial populations were measured. Wells with high total arsenic concentrations had a higher proportion of iron-reducing bacteria than wells with lower arsenic. Iron reducing bacteria, such as members of the genus Geobacter, grow in the absence of oxygen and can transform solid phase iron (Fe(III)) into Fe(II), which is soluble in water. Solid phase Fe(III) can bind to arsenic, immobilizing it on the surface of the solid. When bedrock or soil Fe(III) is transformed into Fe(II), any bound arsenic would also be released into the groundwater. Arsenic (As) also has two commonly occurring forms in groundwater: As(III) and As(V). The prevalence of NP4, a microbe from the genus Sulfurospirillum that can transform As(V) to As(III), which is the more toxic form of As, was also measured. NP4 was more abundant in water samples with higher As(III) concentrations. Thus it appears that iron reducing bacteria affect the overall arsenic concentration, and that arsenic reducing bacteria (NP4) control its form, and thus toxicity, in these regions of Maine.
 
The 15 groundwater samples used in the study were examined using fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH).  This technique allowed the target populations, Geobacter and NP4, to be distinguished from other bacteria. The number of each type of microorganism was compared to the total number of microorganisms in the sample. Geobacter ranged from 1-35% and NP4 from 0-17% of the total suspended bacterial population.  Metals were measured by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission absorption (ICP-AES), and arsenic speciation was obtained by passing a sample through an ion exchange resin in the field to obtain As(III). Total arsenic concentrations ranged from less than 2 parts per billion (ppb) to 2000 ppb, which is 200 times higher than the EPA’s water quality limit of 10 ppb. As(III) ranged from <2 ppb to 1100 ppb. The researchers hope that by learning more about the arsenic release mechanisms, they will be able to target high-risk areas for testing and develop management options to minimize arsenic concentrations.
 
 
 
 
Related Studies
 
B. Hambsch, B. Raue, H.-J. Brauch, "Determination of Arsenic(III) for the Investigation of the Microbial Oxidation of Arsenic(III) to Arsenic(V), Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol., 23/4 (1995) 166-172. DOI: 10.1002/aheh.19950230404

K.A. Rittle, J.I. Drever and P.J.S Colberg, Precipitation of arsenic during bacterial sulfate reduction, Geomicrobiol. J. 13 (1995), pp. 1–11.

P.R. Dowdle, A.M. Laverman and R.S. Oremland, Bacterial dissimilatory reduction of arsenic (V) to arsenic (III) in anoxic sediments, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62 (1996), pp. 1664–1669.

D. Ahmann, L.R. Krumholz, H.H. Hemond, D.R. Lovley and F.M.M. Morel, Microbial mobilization of arsenic from sediments of the Aberjona watershed, Environ. Sci. Technol. 31 (1997), pp. 2923–2930.  DOI: 10.1021/es970124k

K.H. Nealson, Sediment bacteria: Who’s there, what are they doing, and what’s new?, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 25 (1997), pp. 403–434. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.25.1.403
 
J.F. Stolz and R.S. Oremland, Bacterial respiration of arsenic and selenium, FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 23 (1999), pp. 615–627. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1999.tb00416.x

D.E. Cummings, F. Caccavo, S. Fendorf, R.F. Rosenzweig, Arsenic mobilization by the dissimilatory Fe(III)-reducing bacterium Shewanella alga BrY, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33/5 (1999) 723-729. DOI: 10.1021/es980541c

R. Turpeinen, M. Pantsar-Kallio, M. Haggblom, T. Kairesalo, Influence of microbes on the mobilization, toxicity and biomethylation of arsenic in soil, Sci. Total Environ., 236/1-3 (1999) 173-180. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00269-7

J. Zobrist, P.R. Dowdle, J.A. Davis and R.S. Oremland, Mobilization of arsenite by dissimilatory reduction of adsorbed arsenate, Environ. Sci. Technol. 34 (2000), pp. 4747–4753. doi: 10.1021/es001068h

R.S. Oremland, P.R. Dowdle, S. Hoeft, J.O. Sharp, J.K. Schaefer, L.G. Miller, J. Switzer Blum, R.L. Smith, N.S. Bloom, and D. Wallschlaeger, Bacterial dissimilatory reduction of arsenate and sulfate in meromictic Mono Lake, California, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 64 (2000) 3073 - 3084. doi:10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00422-1

S.E. Hoeft, F. Lucas, J.T. Hollibaugh, and R.S. Oremland, Characterization of microbial arsenate reduction in the anoxic bottom waters of Mono Lake, California. Geomicrobiol. J. 19 (2002) 23 - 40. DOI: 10.1080/014904502317246147

Shigeki Yamamura, Michihiko Ike, Masanori Fujita, Dissimilatory arsenate reduction by a facultative anaerobe, Bacillus sp. strain SF-1, Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 96/5 (2003) 454-460.  doi:10.1016/S1389-1723(03)70131-5

M.-C. Dictor, F. Battaglia-Brunet, F. Garrido, P. Baranger, Arsenic oxidation capabilities of a chemoautotrophic bacterial population: Use for the treatment of an arsenic contaminated wastewater, J. Phys. IV, 107 (2003) 377.  DOI: 10.1051/jp4:20030320

F. Islam, A. Gault, C. Boothman, D. Polya, J. Charnock, D. Chatterjee, J. Lloyd, Role of metal-reducing bacteria in arsenic release from Bengal delta sediments, Nature, V. 430 (2004) 68-71. doi:10.1038/nature02638

Corinne R. Lehr, Des R. Kashyap, Timothy R. McDermott, New Insights into Microbial Oxidation of Antimony and Arsenic, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 73/7 (2007) 2386-2389. doi:10.1128/AEM.02789-06
 
E. Danielle Rhine, Katheryn M. Onesios, Michael E. Serfes, John R. Reinfelder, L.Y. Young, Arsenic Transformation and Mobilization from Minerals by the Arsenite Oxidizing Strain WAO, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42/5 (2008) 1423-1429. doi: 10.1021/es071859k
 
 

# Related Links
 
 
 
 Related News
 



Comments






Imprint     Disclaimer

© 2003 - 2010 by European Virtual Institute for Speciation Analysis ( EVISA )